Italian online TV station QOOB held a fan-made video contest for Erlend Øye-project The Whitest Boy Alive, and the winning clip is a treat for your computer-burned retinas. Vid-maker Mauro Vecchi sets some famous optical illusions to the laggard, dry dance stomp of “Golden Cage.” It’s like a “browser refresh” for your eyes and ears, computer nerds. Watch it. (via P4K)

Erlend Øye // The Whitest Boy Alive | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Erlend Øye of The Whitest Boy Alive | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
the whitest boy alive is the side project of erlend oeye whose main ...
Erlend Øye en The Whitest Boy Alive (Live @ Velvet, 14.03.10)
Sorry, there are no News results for this search.
Comments (10)
  1. actually i don’t see my skin creeping and crawling i am just seeing that union jack all over the place!

  2. damn nerdy white boys….

  3. calliwell  |   Posted on Jan 25th, 2007

    I second seeing the union jack…even as I type this.

  4. I also see that union jack! Damn it, it won’t go away!

  5. Erik Carter  |   Posted on Jan 25th, 2007

    The union jack will not go away.

  6. mercator  |   Posted on Jan 25th, 2007

    yeah, even after the skin-crawling shit, i’m still seeing the union jack.

    my favorite visual ‘trick,’ is when somebody photoshops an extra pair of eyes and mouth on a portrait… it’s nearly impossible to take it all in. i guess. fun.

  7. mike  |   Posted on Jan 26th, 2007

    union jack haunts me in the dreams…

  8. steve perry  |   Posted on Jan 26th, 2007

    wonderful video. flag should’ve been norway’s, though.

  9. the ghost of english future  |   Posted on Jan 26th, 2007

    what makes people so arrogant/ignorant that they insist on writing in a language they haven’t mastered without simply asking a friend to proofread it?

    i’ll never understand it…

  10. the ghost of english past and present  |   Posted on Jan 27th, 2007

    ok, ghost of English future, you were being sarcastic, yes? perhaps aiming for clever, or attempting some ironic or facetious sentiment? Because I watched the video twice, to see what you were bitching about, and the English, both in grammar and diction, is formally correct.
    Clearly, with you as ‘the ghost of English future’, we’re completely fucked if you’re indicative of the command of English the future possesses.
    (That big part in the middle-end? That was misspelled on purpose. Your intuitive reading skills are a bit… simplistic)

    Unless, of course, you spotted something trivial which I missed…. which I doubt.

Leave a Reply

Login

You must be logged in to post, reply to, or rate a comment.

%s1 / %s2