Like so many bands before them, Van Halen do not approve of their music being used on the presidential campaign trail (McCain used “Right Now” as an entrance theme in Ohio this morning). “Permission was not sought or granted nor would it have been given,” says VH management. “They’re not political, they’re just rock and roll.” Also Sarah Palin’s favorite meal is moose stew.
You Might Also Like
 Van Halen – “Blood And Fire” (Preview) |  Is Van Halen’s New Song 35 Years Old? |  Van Halen – “Tattoo” Video |  Reunited Van Halen Prep A Different Kind Of Truth, Tour |
 |
 |
%s1 / %s2
Does any politician clear their music selection with the artists beforehand? (I doubt it considering it’s fair use.) So, do these artists just disapprove of the use or do the ever send cease & desist letters? I get confused, because nowadays it almost seems like good press for a band to just say no to whomever uses their song, no matter the affiliation.
I haven’t seen any video of the song being used by McCain, but unless it was a very short clip it definitely doesn’t fall under Fair Use guidelines.
I don’t think it was used in any kind of clip, they just played over the speakers at the rally Palin spoke at. I’m guessing they don’t need permission for that sort of thing or VH would be suing.
i liked it better when mccain was using ‘running on empty’ by jackson browne, before jackson told him to fuck off. i mean, that pretty much sums up mccain’s campaign anyway.
Sarah Palin’s kids are named “Willow”, “Piper”, and “Trig”.
II’m fairly certain Sammy Hagar is a Republican and probably wouldn’t give a shit, though I’m guessing he no longer has a say in these matters.
Hagar’s cool with it! PHEW
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=103798
Where is the RIAA backlash from this?
I thought so.
It’s such a shitty song I think they should take whatever airplay they can get.
Just because McCain plays the song doesn’t mean the Republican party endorses Cabo Wabo tequila or Sammy over Dave, it just means they have bad taste in music.
If they were going to boost a Van Halen song, it should have been, “Hot For Teacher”…
running with the devil to obvious for sarah to come out to?
So I’m assuming the ASCAP will be getting involved in this matter now since, according to the smug FAQ on their website (http://www.ascap.com/licensing/licensingfaq.html), “while we may have emotionally adopted [a] song, it still legally belongs to the songwriter who created it, and the music publisher who markets it. When you use other people’s property, you need to ask permission.” Surely, if they’re taking such a hard line against small unlicensed venues in, say, Baltimore (http://www.citypaper.com/music/story.asp?id=15510) – like the one my DJ partners and I declined to play at tomorrow night because we were informed at the last minute that we essentially wouldn’t be able to play basic shit like New Order or M.I.A. (and you better believe I’m not trying to get sued for playing “Blue Monday”) – then a major political party with barrels and barrels of pork at its disposal should be no different. We’re all upstanding citizens here, and we want the rule of law to be enforced. I’ll notify the ASCAP immediately so they can begin drafting a license for the RNC. May God bless the United States.
“RIAA backlash”??? “Fair use”???? Boy are you folks stupid.
These songs are licensed for public performance and groups like the RNC and DNC regularly obtain the rights to use these songs and sometimes the writer of the song whines about the song being used in a campaign, but the campaign does not have to discontinue it’s use.
Quote: “I’ll notify the ASCAP immediately so they can begin drafting a license for the RNC. May God bless the United States” -What a moron! They already have rights to use the songs you imbecile! Stupid ****