Today is going pretty well. I am wearing a cardigan, which is a thing I do sometimes now. I am meeting an old college friend tonight, which plays into it. Due to the meeting, probably going to have a salad for lunch to get myself in that TIME-TO-IMPRESS mindset. It's similar a bit to the mentality expressed during the last bit of Gabe Liedman's stand-up album, but not entirely.
Really hope that with the addition of Jesse Eisenberg, Kelly gets a shot to do a quick script doctor polish on Snyder's latest draft. I for one would appreciate less Jesse as a supervillain and more Jesse as a child reviewing restaurants.
I am just watching the recent run of Doctor Who, and those sorts of things bother me somewhat too in Angels Take Manhattan. How can the baby blow without moving! I said to my Hulu last night (in a huff).
I had always hoped someone named Julie Brown was eventually cast in this show because then it would always make me chuckle when people referred to her as Downton Julie Brown.
My friend was talking about I Am Love a few months ago and I directed him to this review. He enjoyed it just as I am enjoying it all over again! Memories.
Erinn Hayes. I forget the character name and I think it happened off camera. It was because they were working on the same school committee or something. Julia seemed pretty chill about it and handled it chillly if I recall.
I can see Taylor getting into a real Notting Hill situation and by that I mean she will find happiness with Hugh Grant.
Also, Taylor would be better than Bruno Mars for the Super Bowl. But the weirdest part is what are RHCP doing there!? Why do the good time vibes of Bruno Mars need to be buttressed with a 14 minute version of Under the Bridge?
I forget where I saw this - probably on Tumblr, the world's foremost source for Sherlock things - but Moffat said in an interview that the scenario laid out at the end was the real scenario (seemingly confirmed in this article - http://voices.suntimes.com/arts-entertainment/the-daily-sizzle/answers-to-your-sherlock-questions-because-you-know-youve-got-em/ ).
That's a bit of a let down given its ambiguity on the show. And as Kelly said above, the side-stepping was clever. Now, if there is ever any vague parts of this show, I have to go find interviews with Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat? There are only so many hours in the day!
Comments