<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stereogum &#187; Pamela Anderson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stereogum.com/tag/pamela-anderson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stereogum.com</link>
	<description>MP3s, videos, news, reviews, and indie rock gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Newlyweds Of The Year&#8221; No More</title>
		<link>http://stereogum.com/4033/newlyweds_of_the_year_no_more/news/</link>
		<comments>http://stereogum.com/4033/newlyweds_of_the_year_no_more/news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stereogum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kid Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Anderson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gotta feel for the sad sack that pitched the feature on Pam and Kid in December&#8217;s GQ as &#8220;Newlyweds Of The Year.&#8221; Guess we understand the need to anoint some sort of cutting-edge couple (hardly), but that longevity radar was waaay off, Kid. TMZ&#8216;s got the divorce papers Anderson and Rock filed today. It&#8217;s over! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stereogum.com/4033/newlyweds_of_the_year_no_more/news/"><img src="http://cdn.stereogum.com/wp-content/themes/stereogum/images/story.gif"></a></p><p>Gotta feel for the sad sack that pitched the feature on Pam and Kid in December&#8217;s <i>GQ</i> as &#8220;Newlyweds Of The Year.&#8221; Guess we understand the need to anoint some sort of cutting-edge couple (hardly), but that longevity radar was waaay off, Kid. <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2006/11/27/pam-anderson-files-for-divorce/" target="_new">TMZ</a>&#8216;s got the divorce papers Anderson and Rock filed today. It&#8217;s over! Seriously, what was the over/under on that union? They almost made four months, which is mind boggling in itself. Anyway, unfortunate title aside, the <i>GQ</i> <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/fashion/landing?id=content_5143" target="_new">piece</a> is great for exchanges like this:<br />
<blockquote><b><i>GQ</i></b>: I heard you sang U2?s ?With or Without You? to your new bride.<br />
<font color="blue"><b>KID</b></font>: I wouldn?t do that. That just takes the gay meter right to the end.<br />
<b>PAM</b>: That?s enough with the gay word. That?s not nice.<br />
<font color="blue"><b>KID</b></font>: It?s a new word. All the kids are using it.<br />
<b>PAM</b>: No, they?re not. As long as it?s used in a positive context.</p></blockquote>
<p>Divorce is never cool, people, but if this means no more of these pics, we&#8217;re for it.<br />
<img src="/img/pamelarock.jpg" border="0"><br />
Head over to <i>GQ</i> for pearls about their no-curfew policy and fake-IDs-for-the-kids parenting style, and be forever-amazed that those crazy kids didn&#8217;t make it last.<br />
<p><a href="http://stereogum.com/4033/newlyweds_of_the_year_no_more/news/">Read More...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
