Comments

i'm waiting for their next collab, which will very originally be called 're: stacks'
this is why people in punnable band names end up hating music
can we get Cake back instead? what's that guy up to
lol, liking this template. but this editing on this is actually fairly standard, its the amount of insane shots/massive budget that give it the effect. the editing in the music vid above is more hyped up 2010's youtuber style imo
sorry even the 90s didn't have video editing this obnoxious song's fine tho
right but here's the thing: those who're clapping for Starz or whoever doing this - the clappers think they're clapping because you're all on the same page of righteousness and taking down a bad dude - the company isn't on that page, as you yourself note - they're just about the bottom line and not wanting toxic associations. so it seems like clapping as if this is a pure moral win is kinda ... bullshit? or misguided at the very least
except, why start from the assumption that these massive media corporations have good morals and are 'doing the right thing' to be righteous sweethearts? it can be Interpreted as 'consequences' sure, but that's a retroactive interpretation imo
i hope we can generally agree that while he almost certainly is a shitty person, editing people out of content isn't really a solution
wow very cheesy mixing in the chorus. otherwise not terrible but i mean, this was made to sell whiskey or some shit lets be honest
bro what it's literally the opposite. they've way outgrown their actual appeal
was the weezer collab the best thing she'll ever do? this was... a solid 6.5
alt take: na, this sucks. theres barely a melody, almost no instrumentation - this might as well be a 3 minute podcast with some fancy reverb
to subtweet trump: I like performances that Are live
is this even a performance? might as well have been a lip sync to the old track with some auto tune thrown on. dunno guys
musicians describing their sex lives is 90% of lyrics. sorry he did it uncomfortably well!
pinkerton isn't gross. don't be a baby
this post itself could use an edition
that new mix is super nice
welp, this meme from a few days ago has some new resonance https://twitter.com/EnjoyYrMeanlife/status/1348399963991134213
how is this the best quarantine era live performance
uh, fail. the actual story here today is "Weyes Blood pulls Ariel Pink collab EP from streaming". do you guys even Want my outrage clicks?
why is the name of this artist not made immediately clear in the article, is a question
you mistook my point, it's not about if they're all on the same level (which isn't something we can say without the benefit of hindsight anyway). if we're painting with the moral paintbrush of 'artists who are bad people deserve their records thrown out', then .... you kind of have to follow that train all the way down
what method did you use to dispose of all your lennon/bowie/who/60s/70s/80s records btw? i'm sure the same would work here
I mean that's just classic mom dialogue though
post a comment about it here for clout, wait till the back patting responses roll in, then film yourself putting it in the trash for your ig story. what else is there to do?
downvoted for speaking the truth. now i know how jesus felt
wait how is an artful photo of a baby's fist twee? i retract my question
my point was, the doc does not cross the line into being Overtly sympathetic - or apologizing or rationalizing the behavior. every doc is a balancing act of complicity and being critical. i dont feel 'played' if those are indeed her leanings - she made a good film either way. it still explored the issues i wanted to hear about. why they are there, i have no idea
that's fair (though I do believe you thought all those thoughts, lol) - i think it just comes down to wether a film being 'sympathetic to incels' is a morally bad thing. it's worth remembering its the extreme edge cases who carry out the actual acts of violence - the rest of them are complicit but also you know frustratingly human and occasionally relatable - and the doc explores that. to me, it was a worthwhile documentary either way
interesting. i mean, every doc is 'blinkered', its just editing and the logistics of scope. i found it very effective at portraying that alienation and a solid explanation of the 'culture' for outsiders. if you relate to the people more than you want to well, they are people. sometimes being left to draw your own conclusions is more powerful (even though these types of films rn tend to be opening themselves up to being dragged for doing the opposite of their purpose)
well ok solid thoughts, maybe watch TFW No Gf and get back to me? lets have a educated conversation about it. this kneejerk 'an incel doc? how dare someone make that' is laughable. judge with your eyes people