Comments from Bleh

Wait, BOB DYLAN no. 2? Over MICHAEL JACKSON?? Oh, no, I don’t think so. Personally, I’d have liked to see Michael at #1, although I can totally understand and agree with The Beatles topping him, but he should have been #2 at least. But worse than that is BOB DYLAN being #2???? I personally never liked Bob Dylan, but even so, I just don’t think he changed the world of music and did half as much as Michael.
+3 |
September 8, 2010 on VH1 100 Greatest Artists Of All Time
I also agree with what others have said that if this were truly the 100 Greatest Artist "Of All Time" that Frank Sinatra should definitely have been included. And what about Nat King Cole?
+6 |
September 8, 2010 on VH1 100 Greatest Artists Of All Time
Wait, BOB DYLAN no. 2? Over MICHAEL JACKSON?? Oh, no, I don't think so. Personally, I'd have liked to see Michael at #1, although I can totally understand and agree with The Beatles topping him, but he should have been #2 at least. But worse than that is BOB DYLAN being #2???? I personally never liked Bob Dylan, but even so, I just don't think he changed the world of music and did half as much as Michael.
0 |
September 8, 2010 on VH1 100 Greatest Artists Of All Time