It’s interesting that with the likes of Nickelback, Creed and those bands, it really shows how Bush was dealt FAR too harshly with. Also, I enjoy their entire catalog (haven’t heard the latest yet). “Letting The Cables Sleep” off The Science Of Things is a nice companion to “Glycerine”.
I think it’s alphabetical (though someone must have fucked up and not realized Interpol starts with an I and therefor should be in front of Modest Mouse).
“ghosts of modern rock radio past”…
Linkin Park, Rise Against and Fall Out Boy all put out (fairly) successful new albums in the past 3-4 years so that comment reeks of “I only pay attention to the corner of the internet that is relevant to my narrow crowd” syndrome (all tastes aside).
System Of A Down and Incubus, while fairly stagnant recording-wise, still do big business on the road. AND, finally, Vance Joy is opening for Stereogum’s beloved Taylor Swift this summer but I’m assuming that was supposed to be snark so whatever.
Sites/properties like Stereogum operate on a business model based on pageviews/clicks. While I’m sure there is a sizable audience that cares about Flying Lotus or whatever “cool” new artists there are, articles relating to new releases big more popular artists will likely still drive more pageviews and discussion. Also, sites that are on the endless chase for the next “cool” and “big thing” often end up exhausting users due to them being overly excited about a new band every two days.
That’s pretty impressive. Wish they’d to that hear in NYC.
The summer before college I saw Weezer on their ampitheater tour with Dashboard Confessional opening. Maladorit had been just been released. I remember walking around and seeing a guy wearing a t-shirt that read “Fuck you! I like the green album.” At that point, I didn’t realize I wasn’t supposed to like the Green album (I did, and still do). Point being is that Weezer fans take the band’s 90′s output WAY too seriously. That sort of awkward confusion about sex mixed with angst is only something you can capture in your 20′s. 40-year-olds just can’t mimic that no matter how hard they try.
The Foo Fighters have an “extra” guitarist because Pat Smear is actually IN the band. Also some of their songs have three parts so…makes sense to have the third.
At Governors Ball the VIP section was to the side of the stage and sort of crept up along the side which I think is fair. As a band, I can’t imagine you want the very front to be all VIP dick-heads/industry hanger-on people. The most rabid fans are usually the general admission ones. Is this how most European festivals are set up?
I totally get the celebratory vibe of EDM shows and, while it may not be my thing, tip my hat to the crowd that gets into it. I DO question, as I said below, if the majority of the audience would still be able to enjoy some of things without the use of drugs.
As a guitar player, I have no problem also accepting that music people create with computers/electronics also falls under the category of art (which I don’t think is even the argument here so I have no idea why I typed that). As much as I love being slightly buzzed/drunk at many rock shows I go to, I find that (most of them) still have the possibility to be enjoyed sober. I am genuinely curious if there are people who go to the mainstream-type EDM concerts without being on some sort of drug and enjoy them. That’s not to say that electronic music can’t be enjoyable in a non-altered state but I’m speaking specifically do the “wub wub” popular style right now. Any takers on this? Any straight-edge Deadmau5 fans out there care to weigh in?