Comments from kerda

No, not in my opinion at least. I've been a fan of Bronson for years, and I've always described the "Action Bronson" persona as a mix of Ghostface Killah, Anthony Bourdain and the Dos Equis Man: sort of a fantastical, cosmopolitan dirtbag who travels the world dining with royalty and pissing in alleyways. He's a guy who very much revels in the sort of gleefully scummy sensibility of mid-90s New York rap, but there's pretty much always a tongue planted firmly in cheek. An example from his song "Steve Wynn": "Green Timbs, in Vegas I'm like Steve Wynn/ At the same time fellatio from three twins/ Those are triplets, I been wildin' since the rabbi snipped it/ Then they laughed and made brisket" Why does he seem to piss people off more than guys like Young Thug, or Kevin Gates (whose song "Posed To Be In Love" is literally about beating a girl who cheated on him), or myriad other rappers with equally/more "problematic" content? Because he's white, and he's safe to criticize without facing charges of cultural insensitivity/being racially tone deaf. And I say this as a black guy ( I shouldn't have to note that, but I know the assumptions people will make if I don't). I personally love a lot of rap that, in terms of content, is deeply, deeply fucked up, and I overall tend to have a more liberal view on art, in that I don't see artists as having a moral obligation to "punch up" in their work or advocate on behalf of my personal politics to be interesting/worthwhile. But it does bother me that a lot of the same people who will get very, very angry because Mark Kozelek heckles a female journalist will all day profess their love for Future, a guy whose oeuvre the past few years has been built around shitting on his ex wife. Either you're sensitive to this kind of stuff or you're not, but be consistent. If your righteous indignation in defense of oppressed people only swells up when you're attacking a soft target, then you're a fucking phony.
+46 |
March 31, 2016 on Action Bronson Dropped From Another Concert Lineup After Outcry
So a black rapper, who goes by the stage name "Young Thug", spent his week getting arrested for threatening to shoot someone, indicted for plotting to murder a competitor, and finished it out by releasing a song entitled "I Need Chickens". This sounds like C. Dolores Tucker's vision of a dystopian future.
+1 |
July 19, 2015 on Young Thug – “I Need Chickens” (Prod. Mike WiLL Made-It)
This is sort of the eternal question of hip-hop, whether you're talking about drugs, or misogyny, or crime, or violence or whatever. It's not being conservative or reductive to acknowledge that, yeah, a lot of the cornerstone subject matter of the genre is deeply fucked up stuff, and coming from communities where it's not just a thought experiment or cheap sex appeal, but real shit that real people are dealing with/being influenced by. In one sense, my attitude has always been "It is what is is", since I vehemently reject the notion that black musicians/artists in general should be stuck having to relay "positive" messages, since life (black or otherwise) is chock full of negative shit. Examining that negativity, even in some cases reveling in it, is part of what gives value to art. Exploring the darker side of ourselves is just as worthwhile a pursuit as focusing solely on uplift or a false, unearned sense of hope. However, a lot of modern research on substance abuse posits that it's as much if not more based on circumstance, and not just a product of chemical addiction. It's not unrealistic to think that music glamorizing really dark/risky stuff is going to have an outsized influence on people who simply don't have a lot of resources/opportunity. No reasonable person thinks that Johnny getting turnt to Future is going to turn him into a lean addict, not when he's heading to college in the fall and working at his dad's car dealership over the summer, but Johnny is a lucky motherfucker. I think the ideal would be more music with more nuance. Talk about dark shit, but talk about it in a more rounded manner. A guy like Danny Brown makes drugs sound equal parts exhilarating and horrifying, sometimes on the same song. Vince Staples can make music about gang violence that makes you puff out your chest one moment, then wince in pain the next. This stuff doesn't have to be dour and humorless, but it would be nice if it felt like it emanated from a more grounded, human place than a lot of it currently does.
+6 |
July 10, 2015 on OG Maco: “Future Has Destroyed Countless Lives By Making It Cool To Be A Drug Addict”
At first blush, it confused me that a guy who began his career with a Vanilla Ice hightop and naked aspirations to be the Midwest version of 3rd Bass or House of Pain has gone so hard with the "Red State" Natty Lite pandering in his middle age. But really, his approach is probably more authentically hip-hop now than it was in his youth. Kid Rock of 2015 is selling a stylized, megaphone version of rural whiteness, the same way that most rappers of the past two decades have sold an exaggerated version of urban blackness. The people who identify with Rock and said Anglo artifice do so for the same reasons that people connect with black rappers: outsiders find it exotic, sexy and/or funny, and culturally marginalized insiders appreciate having some semblance of their lives cast as heroic on a grand stage. Even if the vision of rural whiteness Rock peddles may not be nuanced enough to capture the truth of an insider's life, its exaggeration helps it to pass the uncanny valley. By leaping over reality into the realm of the fantastic, it manages to in some ways feel more authentic than a staid, grounded, fucking depressing reflection on these communities defined by crime, poverty and a sense of abandonment. So, am I defending Rock, and some of the knucleheaded shit he says? Yeah, I guess I am to a degree. I can look to my right and see a "Heavy Rotation" recommended mixtape by Juicy J, a contemporary of Rock who's around the same age and still extolling the virtues of good pussy, fast money and strong drugs. I doubt that a deep dive interview with Juicy would reveal a guy of any greater sensitivity or progressivism than Rock, and it would be hypocritical of me to accept his exaggerated urban blackness while shitting on Rock's exaggerated rural whiteness. Both guys are indestructible vets who sell a very particular image that resonates very deeply with a certain audience (probably a lot of the same people, in truth), so more power to them both.
+13 |
February 27, 2015 on Kid Rock Doesn’t Get Beyoncé: Where’s Her “Sweet Home Alabama”?
I think Killer Mike said it best: "You really made it or just became a prisoner of privilege?" There's something profoundly terrifying about the idea that a guy as successful as Wayne, who's been rapping professionally for the last 20 years and has been a gargantuan, world-conquering household name superstar for the last 10, could be so jammed up and beholden to the whims of god knows how many bad actors and scumbags that he has to beg for career help via Twitter. I mean, WTF? Weezy is about as successful as a post-mp3 English language musician could be, rap or otherwise, so imagine how monumentally fucked all of the Schoolboy Qs and A$AP Fergs of the world are.
+6 |
December 4, 2014 on Lil Wayne Calls Himself A “Prisoner” On Cash Money, Says Birdman Won’t Release The Carter V
For her own sake, I hope Meredith is never exposed to rap music. I think she would have a seizure at the sheer volume of hyper-aggressive, oft times violent imagery that's been a hallmark of the genre since its inception. Even worse, most of that music has come from the sorts of long marginalized voices that she seems to be hanging her utopian hopes for the future on. Human beings are assholes. Artists, in particular, are assholes. Being an asshole isn't a trait unique to those who are old, or white, or male or "rockist". I promise you there are plenty of young, black, queer, female artists out there who are raging douchebags with inferiority complexes (see: Azealia Banks). Artists do and always have fought amongst each other, independent of medium, independent of race, independent of time and place. It's monumentally silly to try to spin this one wholly unexceptional example of a guy being a prick into an epitaph on white male privilege. I also don't see how Mark Kozeleck telling a band to "suck his cock" is in some way more "problematic" than Perpetual Think Piece Generating Device Beyonce screaming "Bow down, bitches".
+39 |
October 8, 2014 on Meredith Graves Condemns Mark Kozelek’s Diss Track And The Language Of Abuse
Wow.... I don't shock easy, but this is one of the most skull-numbingly fucked up things I've probably ever read. For the most part, I don't subscribe to notions of certain people being abjectly "evil", as I believe pretty much everyone is capable of immense cruelty and barbarism, and "evil" is more a product (of circumstance, of culture, of too much power and too few boundaries) than it is a state of being. However, stuff like plotting how to get children addicted to meth so you can train them as sex slaves, or filming yourself fucking a baby, crosses a line that I can't really rationalize. I don't know what circumstance or mindset you could find yourself in where these things seemed reasonable or justifiable. This is just indulging in depravity because you can, because you're intoxicated by the idea of subverting fundamental notions of humanity. This is the embrace of "evil" as a fully-consuming state of being.
+17 |
November 26, 2013 on Lostprophets Singer Pleads Guilty To Indescribable Sex Crimes
In today's rap scene, a mixtape is largely just a free album. In the 90s, hip-hop mixtapes were more like actual, traditinal mixtapes, in that you had a DJ creating a mix of current hits, upcoming, unreleased singles by both label and underground artists, and freestyles. This was technically illegal, since they were selling copyrighted music, but labels put up with it since it was effectively free promotion. Mixtapes were the original music blogs, and were the fastest, most effective ways to break new songs and artists. This changed somewhat in the early 2000s, as you had an influx of single artist/crew mixtapes from collectives like G-Unit and Dipset that were less about the DJ and more akin to slapdash albums playing loose with copyright law. There was an entire era of (largely failed) "mixtape rappers" who had released hundreds of songs and freestyles before ever releasing major label debuts (Joe Budden, Papoose, Saigon, Uncle Murda, etc.). It was actually Budden's 2006 Mood Muzik 2 that really began the trend of mixtapes featuring mostly if not exclusively original production and fully formed, hook-laden, radio ready songs. Mixtapes became a way for rappers to release music in an era where the label business was imploding, finished albums were sitting on the shelf for years and traditional big budget marketing and promotion only existed for the Jays and Ems of the world. Mixtapes in the "blog rap" era have just taken that to the extreme. On the whole, major labels don't fuck with rap anymore, and if you're a new artist trying to make a name, without a marketing machine behind you, you can't realistically expect people to come to your Bandcamp page and put down money for a 7 song EP. So, you release that shit free, and if you're lucky, some blogs pick it up, and you can go on a small tour, and maybe a street clothing brand or a liquor company will want to co-opt your coolness by paying you to make a video, or even sponsor a new mixtape, at which point the cycle begins again. There are a not insignificant number of rappers who've never released commercial albums but tour the world just off of succesful mixtapes. So basically, a modern mixtape is what would've been referred to in the past as a demo, except it's publicly available, and you have to keep making them to stay relevant in the endless churn of the blogosphere. Being a rapper circa-2013 is like being a professional amateur musician.
+2 |
November 6, 2013 on Mixtape Of The Week: Action Bronson & Party Supplies Blue Chips 2
I very much agree with this. Also, while nobody would deny that Eminem is one of the all time great rap technicians, I've always felt that he gets elevated a bit beyond his accomplishments due to the fact that he's many older people's only real exposure to serious, verbose, dexterous rap music. The original MMLP was very much a product of late 90s/early 2000s hip-hop album construction: overlong, brilliant in spots, droning in others, and a prime example of the singles legitimately being the best songs on the album. I think there are a lot of 30s/40s "rock dad" types for whom Em is still the first and last word on artistry in rap music, and I think you'll see that reflected in the reviews. Youth music outlets are going to skewer it for being out of touch, tonedeaf dreck, but establishment papers and mags are going to cheer the return of their beloved enfant terrible, the guy who scrubs hip-hop music of all of the groove and dangerous, unhinged sexuality that makes it so threatening, and replaces it with good old-fashioned all-'Merican ultraviolence. The fact that pre-orders for this have topped the iTunes charts all week, while Danny Brown never even cracked the top 10, makes me deeply sad.
+5 |
November 1, 2013 on Premature Evaluation: Eminem The Marshall Mathers LP 2
Man...people are kind of dicks about women's bodies. It's not like this is a particularly erotic photograph. Doesn't it seem strange that a woman can't display her naked torso without the image being decried as pornography? Doesn't that embody the unhealthy degree to which we fetishize and claim public ownership over women's bodies? It's creepy and patronizing to construe a woman's decision to present her body as intrinsically exploitative, as though clothing is the only means by which women can maintain agency over their art. Also, saying "she's just desperate for attention" ignores the fact that ALL artists are desperate for attention. A desperate need to be validated by others is sort of the default prerequisite for dedicating your life to a creative pursuit. People who are "well adjusted" and satisfied by the love and respect of close friends and family aren't typically inclined to throw themselves naked and raw to a cruel, disinterested public, to present the bloodiest, most wounded slabs of their person up for consumption.
+27 |
October 10, 2013 on Sky Ferreira Is Topless In NSFW Night Time, My Time Cover
Why are there so few (any?) black writers working at the major youth music sites/magazines? As this article attests to, there's probably never been a point in American music history with less overt segregation of consumption than right now, so while it's both reasonable and positive that formerly indie-dominated media would begin covering traditionally "black" music in earnest, it's a shame that we haven't seen a similar sense of diversity creep into the ranks of the people actually writing the coverage. "What’s not up for debate is that any privileged person who is interested in behaving benevolently needs to focus less on their rights and more on how they affect less-privileged people. That’s a conversation whose terms the less-privileged ought to dictate." Good point, but sort of hollow when said people of "less-privilege" aren't really being invited to join the discussion, let alone dictate it. That being said, Stereogum and every other site are going to hire writers capable of translating a vast world of diverse music down to a language and sensibility that connects with their readership, a readership that I'm going to guess skews heavily towards the young, white and educated. I get it, but it makes articles like this come across as disingenuous and self-serving, where the point isn't to dig at a challenging nugget of cultural politics, to get messy and pose hard questions to your audience, but to assuage their conscience and politely brush aside misgivings while waving the neon flag of "poptimism". I guess my point is that you can't have it both ways. Either you make an effort to have an active dialogue with a diverse coterie of writers about a diverse selection of music, or you accept your role as an anthropologist, translating outsider culture for consumption by the insiders.
+4 |
September 12, 2013 on Deconstructing: Big Sean, 2 Chainz, And The Racial Politics Of Punchline Rap
It must suck to be an Asian girl. You've got a constant stream of THE creepiest white dudes coming up to you and thinking that you're the embodiment of their submissive schoolgirl fantasy. Really, I don't know that any demographic in this country are as overtly, perversely fetishized as women of east Asian descent. Clever marketing gimmick, though.
0 |
September 4, 2013 on The Weeknd Is Taking Fan Phone Calls Now
1) This song is horrible. 2) It's like Em has devolved into a late 90s self-parody of "white rap". I feel like I should be playing cornhole and getting buzzed off of Natty Light while listening to this. 3) That being said, has Eminem ever released a first single that wasn't borderline unlistenable? "My Name Is" was sort of a fun novelty record, but everything since has been roughly equivalent to the idiocy of "Berzerk", so there's still hope that the rest of the album will be more palatable. But I'm not holding my breath. I'll always contend that Eminem is one of the most technically gifted rappers in history, but has never released a true, honest to god classic album. MMLP sold a lot of copies and introduced large swaths of white America to virtuosic "lyrical" rap, but it's a bloated mess.
+9 |
August 27, 2013 on Eminem – “Berzerk”
I'm forever baffled by the notion that music fandom forces you to be IN OPPOSITION TO!!!! something. There's a lot of music that I don't listen to, simply because it doesn't appeal to me, but I don't then automatically assume that my distaste for it is an indicator of that music being worthless/for morons/made by untalented hacks etc., because I don't work from the assumption that I'm the arbiter of objective taste. If there's one thing I've learned in life, it's that everything has hidden levels of complexity. Everything. I'm not saying that you aren't allowed to have your tastes or predilections, because we all do, but have at least a modicum of perspective that your tastes aren't born of unbiased, dispassionate analysis. You like the things you like because you are who you are. People who like things different than you do aren't inherently charlatans or liars or simpletons. They may just not be you.
+8 |
August 6, 2013 on Deconstructing: The O.C. And Indie Rock Gentrification
I don't think people ever stop to really think about how young the canon of Western "pop music" really is. We're talking about 50/60 years worth of music here, and during a timespan that's seen radical technological changes that forever altered the way music is made, the way it sounds, the way it's sold, the way it's distributed etc. Articles like this always work from the assumption that there was an immovable, sharply defined foundation of "authentic" or "hip" music deeply lodged into the zeitgeist, and any changes to that perception were inevitably the result of drastic, tectonic shifts in the crust of pop culture. Really, I don't think that rock music is dead by any means, but I do think kids making music today, who grew up in the 80s and 90s, are dramatically less fascinated by Bob Dylan and The Beatles and The Stones than kids who grew up in the 60s and 70s were, which is entirely logical. The "pop music" that those 60s/70s babies made sounded like the radio music they grew up listening to, so it's only logical that kids who grew up on Michael Jackson and Madonna and Tupac and R Kelly are going to make music that reflects that. What's weird isn't that kids who grew up on Janet Jackson love Beyonce, but that a lot of music critics assumed that said kids would just automatically adopt the same aesthetics and notions of "authenticity" as people 20 years their senior. I'm of the opinion that baby boomers came very close to ruining music, due to their creating this notion of there being an immortal, sacrosanct canon of pop music royalty that all must pay homage to and that none can ever surpass. The downturn in rock's popularity amongst the youth-music intelligentsia is simply a reaction to that, a need to cleanse the palette and break away from the suffocating grip of the Rock Gods!!! In 10 or 20 years, once the boomers are dead and kids want nothing more than to eradicate the omnipresent synth pop their parents listen to, they'll pick guitars back up and start doing weird, fun things with the genre to give it brand new life.
+11 |
August 6, 2013 on Deconstructing: The O.C. And Indie Rock Gentrification
I would agree. The album has actually grown on me substantially since I first listened to it on Thursday (to note: I was listening while nursing a brutal hangover and playing Animal Crossing, so it had less than my full attention). It actually reminds me to some degree of Reasonable Doubt. It's nowhere near RD quality, quite obviously, but it shuffles along at an unhurried gait, content in its own being, in a way that Jay-Z of the Def Jam and beyond era was never really comfortable with. Outside of that insta-skip Beyonce duet, nothing on the album feels particularly "single"-y. Even "Holy Grail" is too long and too awkwardly structured to really fit comfortably into the "hook - verse - hook - verse - hook" structure of rap radio. "La Familia" is probably the breeziest, least hurried Jay-Z song since "Feelin' It" or "Cashmere Thoughts". And I was ready, EAGER to hate this album. I'm infatuated with Yeezus, and I was EAGER to hoist up MCHG as comparatively bankrupt, artistically, musically, intellectually. But I can't. It's not an album that asks much of anything from me, or that thrills me, or that's home to many if any songs that will find their way to the career-spanning greatest hits retrospective, but it's an expensive sounding, beautifully mastered album that knocks incredibly hard when it wants to, helmed by a guy who's past his prime but still one hell of a rapper. Look past the gross Samsung affiliation and it's hard to hate if you genuinely enjoy meat and potatoes hip-hop music. Also, as a side note, it really bothers me that so many critics are having bitch fits about his commodification of the "high art" world. As somebody with a dusty studio art BFA sitting on his proverbial shelf, I feel at least moderately qualified to say that vacuos image and shameless commodification have long been a part of the modern art scene. Jay-Z cheapens the art world in the same way that NWA created the word "nigger", or how Snoop Doggy Dog was the inventor of referring to women as "bitches". The lesson to be learned by the backlash to MCHG is that you can spend 16 years bragging about selling drugs to your community and be a critical darling, but start appropriating fine art imagery and OH MY GOD THAT MONSTER NEEDS TO BE STOPPED!!! Priorities, people, priorities.
0 |
July 10, 2013 on Premature Evaluation: Jay-Z Magna Carta Holy Grail
While nothing on this list is as egregious as choosing Vol 3 as the best Jay-Z album (a choice that bent the notion of art's subjectivity to its breaking point), creating a list of the best MF DOOM albums and not topping it with either Madvillainy or Operation: Doomsday is still kind of baffling. Really, these album ranking lists are pretty damn genius. Not because they produce compelling, thoughtful music journalism (which they don't), but because they provide an endless stream of easy, antagonistc content guaranteed to generate lots of pageviews and indulge in that classic rock critic conceit of flying in the face of stodgy, old-guard consensus and championing unlikely, overlooked, perhaps even maligned albums as some form of punk rock contrarianism. Mind you, I'm commenting, so I'm by no means above the cheap thrill of getting into pointless arguments about pop culture ephemera, and flinging the faux-outrage like it's going out of style, but I at least have the decency to be ashamed of it.
+7 |
December 13, 2012 on MF Doom Albums From Worst To Best
In fairness, using a boner to draw attention IS a lot edgier than going the traditional route of tits, ass, or a potent amalgam of the two. But seriously, I don't think the Death Grips ethos is "Shock/Disgust With Meaning", it's just "Shock/Disgust". That's not even a critique, but just saying that they exist (at least in their minds) as some sort of flailing dervish of "fuck you" energy meant to strike at anything smooth and shiny. I actually kind of appreciate their willingness to just be antagonistic for the sake of being antagonistic. They aren't "clever", and I think there's some value to acts that just rage to rage, and demand that you pick a side in the eternal struggle between order and chaos. The fact that most of us are going to fall on the side of order doesn't mean that being forced to make the choice wasn't valuable as a form of self-accounting.
+6 |
November 1, 2012 on Death Grips Dropped By Epic
I think there's a definite bias for female pop, which is why most of the big budget pop artists you see get major love on indie sites (Swift, Beyonce, Rihanna, Nicki Minaj, Lady Gaga, even Perry to some extent) are ladyfolk. Not to be too much "That Guy", but I think there still exists to some degree a sense that women's music is intrinsically vapid/superfluous, so a female musician pumping out an unapologetic stream of high fructose corn syrup is unlikely to be seen as a detriment, and in some ways more honest. The irony is that most defenses of this kind of music tend to paint critics as themselves sexist, since they have an issue with "girly" music, the notion being that shallow, unthinking perspectives on relationships are inherently the domain of young women. There's more of an expectation placed upon young men to come with depth and substance, that there's a deep pop music legacy for men to live up to, regardless of their genre. So when you have somebody like Flo Rida, or Chris Brown, who make music that's functionally identical to their more respected female counterparts, they're shunned relentlessly. I mean, hell, look at the two albums in this article that are being used to exemplify the return of "good music" to the pop charts. You have Kendrick, who has created an ALBUM (caps intended), something that demands repeat listening, that fans have banded together to deconstruct and analyze and digest, because it's such a rich piece of narrative that drips with specificities of time and place and circumstance. On the other hand, you have Swift, and the debate more or less peters out at "How many hit singles do you think the album has?". While a lot of critics love (or at least have a respectful tolerance of) Lady Gaga, the notion of her possibly sullying the Kendrick album has repeatedly been a point of admitted concern in most reviews of GCMC. We recoil at the notion of that superfluos girliness creeping into our "art". And the point isn't that all music critics are raging sexists, but there are certains gender roles that are just hard-coded into our perception of pop music, without us even really recognizing them most of the time. The solution isn't for all of the beardy music dudes to have a big masturbatory forum and discuss gender roles in music criticism, but just start hiring more women for these sites, who are obviously going to want/appreciated different things from their music than guys do. It's the same way the whole "rockist" discussion in the early-aughts didn't result in a greater diversity of voices writing for the sites/magazines, but the same 20/30-something middle class white dudes making believe they really connected with the new Jill Scott album. So, yeah. That's my long-winded, kind of inflammatory answer to your question.
+8 |
November 1, 2012 on Deconstructing: Taylor Swift, Kendrick Lamar, Soundscan & The Future Of The Album
Death Grips is a group that has absolutely, positively zero commercial/pop prospects, so it's not as though this was a band that was "finding its voice", with MC Ride showing up as a judge on The Voice a few years from now. They were never going to soundtrack an iPad commercial, they were never going to perform on Fallon, they were never going to do anything more than be a niche group that some people loved to death for their uncompromising punk/noise/pseudo-anarchic nature, and other people just found shrill and obnoxious. Now, though, they've afforded themselves a huge dollop of anti-establishment "cred", and will spend the next year making decent money traveling the world and playing alternative shows/festivals, further shoring up that diehard fanbase that they're going to need if they have any hopes of making this project a long-term career choice. This literally couldn't have worked out better for Death Grips. Also, a major label tut-tutting "marketing and publicity stunts" is 1) epic LOLZ, and 2) a great example of why major labels are dying/dead. We're in a weird era where artists have become more ruthless/savvy at knowing how to market and exploit their image than the labels are. The idea that you're going to take a 17 year old and groom them into a pop star is so painfully antiquated, when that 17 year old has been studying Grimes and Lil B and The Weeknd and has already crafted their own dense mythology and attracted a substantial social media following. To be an effective "music first" company, you need an ecosystem of "music first" musicians to seek out and develop, of which there are none in 2012.
+15 |
November 1, 2012 on Death Grips Dropped By Epic