Is he trying to say people, who know each other well, don't talk about one another? Because that seems like something people totally do all the time in real life.
I just don't understand what people don't like about Community. You can't fault it for taking risk when other network shows mostly play it safe. Who says it needs to be like a regular show? You can't fit a square peg into a round hole. It is at it's best at it's most innovative and weird.
I feel like the characters on Mad Men are more like human beings than most TV characters are. People in real life do not act in a way for you to either like them or hate them. Like the characters on Mad Men, no one is really consistent. I think Megan is a special case where we don't know much about her yet because neither did Don really before he purposed to her. It was supposed to feel like a spur of the moment thing that it was, so just like Don, we will slowly get to know the real her once the whole honeymoon phase is over. If it wasn't like that, you would not get the same effect. It's like Don is your midlife crisis friend who married a younger woman and you just met her and have no idea what to think of her yet.
wow. I thought the complete opposite. I thought this episode was odd and uneven (mostly just the Betty stuff vs. everything else) and that the premiere was excellent.
So it's a film about Roger Sterling being very disappointed about his son and son's girlfriend's choice to be vegan/vegetarian? Quotes from the movie, "It's not in you nature!" - Roger Sterling. "It is nature, Dad" - Matt Saracen.
I hate how every hour-long drama on network TV has to have some sort of procedural element to it. It can't just be a family drama about a guy who is living in 2 separate realities, one reality where his wife died in a car accident and the other his son (apparently that is not an interesting enough premise on it's own). He also has to be murder police, who uses his 2 realities to solve crimes in unexpected ways. All the family stuff on the show has been really well done, while the crime scene investigation stuff is a snooze.
I think Tom is secretly rooting for Paul to win (duh cause he's the best!). He came in and grilled him about not winning a challenge yet and then scorned him like a disappointed dad over the arugula. He clearly wants Paul to do better! I'm glad Paul won tonight, because hasn't he seemed a little more friendly instead of the quiet focus he had all season and slightly off his game ever since he got to Canada?
I think my suspicions that Paul does not drink are confirmed. He didn't participate in the tequila quickfire and he toasted everyone's drinks with water.
http://tvguide.ca/NR/rdonlyres/06DAA88E-1E33-4DC5-88BE-D23C17977AA5/339092/REMOTESNL502.jpg
"I'll buy you a vowel Pat Sajak. When I was a kid, for $5 you could get hot dog, milk, bread, cigarettes, television. Not in my house.”
added note: for good Terrence Malick, go back and watch Badlands and Days of Heaven. You'll find two movies that are beautiful and profound but also entertaining all the way through.
Here my deal with Tree of Life. Here's a movie you thought was beautiful and profound, yet you thought it was pretentious or you thought it was too long or you had a hard time getting through parts or you probably won't watch it again. Why can't a movie be great without all that other baggage attached to it?
I can't bring myself to watch The Tree of Life, I like Terrence Malick and everything, but even people who say they liked it sound like they didn't really like it.
Comments