I don't know, not to be all wet blanket on your rant, but the whole "sometimes yes, sometimes no" thing seems like a perfectly normal and reasonable response. Sometimes you're pretty impressed with yourself, sometimes not so much. I imagine that's how most people who aren't either raging narcissists or clinically depressed feel, most of the time.
If the goal is to make people act like there really is an imminent zombie apocalypse, then what's the end-game, here? For someone to eventually work up the nerve to put a pick-axe through the prankster's skull? Because that person would be a true hero in more ways than one.
Uh, as a cat-lover and owner of two cats, and also as someone who thinks RC helicopters are cool, I think this is unequivocally awesome. It sure beats the paw-print in a little clay mold that I got when my last kitty (whom I miss very much) passed away.
I don't get why this is so weird, to be honest. Nutella is super-yummy. Why *wouldn't* you cover your whole body with it, if you had enough of it lying around? Why *wouldn't* you film yourself doing it?
"Look at me, I am doing something delicious and enjoyable!" -- you, if you were really being honest with yourself.
Each contestant sings their song all alone in a locked, windowless, soundproofed room. The song is not recorded, and the performance is not judged. The results are not broadcast. The entire process takes place in absolute secrecy, and the TV-watching public never hears about any of it. The winner gets to go home and live a normal life and never try to get on a talent-, game- or reality-show again. P.S., every contestant is a winner.
"But what I do have is a particular set of skills, skills I have acquir-- oh, fuck it, just keep her. Her Mom's gonna be all up in my grill either way."
I'm going to go with "Your child is crying, indicating intestinal distress, and repeatedly articulating that she needs to poop, and all you do is laugh nervously and stare glassy-eyed at Natalie Moralez," as something to put my finger on.
I love that they have to specify that he wanted to be touched both "on his anus" and "around" his anus. It's like:
Judge: "So, you're saying, Mr. Travolta tried to force your client to touch him on the anus?"
Lawyer: "Not just on the anus, your honor."
Judge: "Really? Where else then?"
Lawyer: "He also tried to force my client to touch him AROUND the anus."
Judge: "Oh! Really? On it *and* around it? Okay then. SUSTAINED."
WTF with the woman just sort of casually walking over at 0:20? "Hey, that girl just got swallowed by the sidewalk. Looks interesting. Maybe I should check that out."
I'm looking forward to the day when the word "rape" is finally drained of all power and meaning, and people have to move on to an even more loaded word to express their fake exaggerated outrage.
"I just felt so Holocausted when I heard that song used in that commercial."
"Subject: RE: RE: oops [was: RE: FW: RE: FW: RE: "put your cum here and here"] -- Oops, meant to add, 'also put it here.' Stupid app."
--Olivia Munn's "Sent Messages" folder
I feel like that video didn't quite live up to my expectations. Like, maybe it lived up to around 66% of my expectations, but then left me about 33% disappointed.
Comments