Since nailing down Band To Watch status around here earlier this year, the Ivy League Afro-beat/new wave/indie pop kids of VMPRWKND have seen their name written (usually with vowels) in the NMEs and the SPINs the Rolling Stones of the music mag world, have secured a shit-that-was-quick deal with XL, and contributed a well reviewed track to our Radiohead tribute OKX. But you have to imagine VW found it particularly sweet to hear that David Byrne blogged about their set opening for Animal Collective at Webster recently, given their tunes owe such debt to Talking Heads. In the past we said late Heads, while Byrne went with “early”; yeah — we defer.

David wrote on his blog:

Went to see Animal Collective and Vampire Weekend at Webster Hall last night. VW was really good ? poppy, but fairly skewed too, with bits of soukous guitar thrown in from time to time, as if it was just a way of playing lilting guitar and not a specific African style. They?re not a ?world music? act by any stretch; these various styles of playing are all just out there now, to be used when appropriate. I wondered if they sounded a little like early Talking Heads, a little bit, maybe, which of course wouldn?t bother me. They got the crowd moving, which is pretty impressive for an opening act. Catchy tunes too. I?d heard some on an EP or demo CD. They said they?re working on an album now.

Thanks to BV for the tip. David went on to discuss Avey, Panda Bear, and the Geologist’s set at Webster (the second of two nights, the first having been a soundboard debacle):

In the past, Animal Collective were very briefly lumped in with the freak folk crowd, but they couldn?t be further from that now. Very few acoustic instruments remain ? a cymbal got hit and a guitar appeared briefly, but the rest was all pre-recorded tracks, loops and samples. Their instruments were an array of tiny mixing boards and electronics that played Mini Discs or samples. ?Playing? mainly consisted of pushing faders up and down. To be fair, two of the three guys took turns singing, though I couldn?t make out any of the words; so yes, there was more to focus on than just faders moving. Musically, it was an enjoyable sonic collage that never stopped, rather it ebbed and flowed, building up to big washes of sound with echoey singing and then sinking back to a single shimmering loop before building up into a new song.

It was a funny mixture ? they arrayed themselves on stage as if they were a traditional rock band. They?re more akin to laptop DJs than a band, though a band can be anything these days, I guess. The singing and dancing about are not usually part of the laptop scene, so that part energized the show in a good way.

And during that time in NYC, AC hit NBC for a taping of Conan, where they showed the Late Night audience their “#1,” (with excessive amounts of Avey vocal distortion, what better way to impress a crowd on your national television debut?). Also worth noting: Deakin’s there! He’s been missing all tour. Damned if he’d miss this though, eh?

Finally, for those wondering why the Collective called this year’s release Strawberry Jam, Noah explains to Rolling Stone:

I was sitting on a plane and I got a tray of food with a packet of strawberry jam. It looked really futuristic, like an alien landscape made from strawberries. I wanted to get the recordings to sound like that stuff looked.

There’s something to chew on next time you enjoy your toast.

Comments (16)
  1. tyler  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    the conan performance was sort of underwhelming but surreal enough

  2. charlie  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    i was expecting one of the more NBC friendly tracks from strawberry jam, and was quite surprised to hear #1, it made the performance that much cooler.

  3. Liam  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    that was pretty much the last song i was expecting them to play. it was interesting, but i think “peacebone” or “for reverend green” would’ve worked much better.

    and is it just me, or does panda bear look like the most bored person of all time? i’ve seen him play solo and with AC, and he always looks like he’s having no fun whatsoever.

  4. He just washed his hair this time. No, but seriously he always seems to have fun… he just focuses too much. I don’t complain.

  5. Grendelsbacon  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    I could have sworn they were going to do “For Reverend Green” so when they started playing “#1″ I was kind of bummed, but it was still good. They definitely had more accessible stuff on the album though. I was almost at that Conan taping too…

  6. kingoffresno  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    The AC show on Monday was awesome, it’s great to see a band at their peak just absolutely kill it. And seeing Byrne at the bar ordering a beer with a bemused smile on his face made my whole night. Conan performance a touch underwhelming I must say though.

  7. hater  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    Is it punk rock to hate Animal Collective yet? Because dudes seriously suck.

  8. They should have played something a bit more dynamic and exciting. Actually, anything other than #1 from Strawberry Jam would have been better.

  9. eric  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    I find it funny that this post started out about Vampire Weekend and all anyone cares about commenting on is animal collective. just funny that’s all.

  10. randy  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    Saw Vampire Weekend at the Croc a couple of weeks ago; they were excellent. And I can definitely see the Talking Heads influences. No coincidence that I was a big fan of Byrne and company back in the day.
    Animal Collective isn’t that interesting to me. Too gimmicky by half.

  11. Mike  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    I can’t imagine AC made any new fans with that performance. It was pretty cool, but I would have loved to see “Peacebone”, “For Reverend Green”, or “Fireworks”. Still, I give them props for baffling an entire audience of late-night TV viewers.

  12. Mike  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    Oh, and lol at Avey finding inspiration in a packet of jam.

  13. Sure they baffled an entire audience of late night viewers….but what’s the point? “#1″ is the low point of Strawberry Jam — it just drones along…nothing too dynamic…nothing too melodic…it’s just kind of there…with pitch shifted vocals that sound like a kid’s Halloween movie soundtrack. I don’t understand why they wouldn’t choose a song like “Peacebone,” “For Rev. Green,” or “Fireworks,” which all show off their unique style much much more. I’m just glad I didn’t stay up to watch this when it aired, I would have been let down big time.

  14. Mike Wallace Hater  |   Posted on Oct 8th, 2007 0

    Maybe they chose the song because it was the length required for a Conan performance (less than 4 minutes). All the hits on their new album are too long.

  15. Chris  |   Posted on Oct 9th, 2007 0

    FUCK. THIS. BAND.

  16. I think they played #1 not to win new fans but to avoid losing old ones. their new record is in danger of doing so, so they played a song that showcases their “old” selves, albiet at their most boring, rather than their even lamer “new” selves.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post, reply to, or rate a comment.

%s1 / %s2