Been staying out of SUD because I'm usually busy on Friday and don't get to the thread in time for any discussion to still be going on. Making an exception to tell you you've done the impossible and somehow managed to be a more toxic user than Roland. Go fuck yourself, asswipe.
Above average Post Malone song, does what it's expected to and does it well. Bonus points for the Thugger feature. Not gonna blow anyone's mind or anything, but I prefer it to most of the stuff on the charts not named "Old Town Road".
It's hardly a secret that the "live-action" Disney remakes are a soulless ploy for cash aimed squarely at parents looking for something safe and familiar to take their kid to. Yeah, it'll be an inessential curio that'll never live up to the original, but I appreciate the casting choice if it means at least one child sees this version of Ariel and feels like they see themself in it.
I mean, yeah, at the end of the day it's still a shitty joke. Just saying that as a celebrity there's not much he can really do about that. Now, on the topic of reasons Drake can get fucked, this barely even cracks the top 50, what the child neglect and barely concealed pedophilia.
I think her forgiving him for mercilessly beating the shit out of her on several occasions says a lot about what being a celebrity does to someone's brain.
When was the last time Madonna did anything even remotely tasteful or showed sensitivity to someone other than herself after pretending to show sensitivity for others?
Ah, damn, it's just his work with a lead artist credit. I was hoping for a list of the best songs he's ever produced in any role. Something like that would be damn interesting to read for a lot of artists. Bold move snubbing "Uptown Funk" for #1, but I guess that's the power of Angel Olsen.
The scene is incredibly dated and more than a little lame. I wouldn't have bothered including it in my TV show, either. Whether this is two guys or two girls, it's still legal if it can prove itself to be satire, even if said satire isn't particularly relevant or funny.
He's a presumably straight, presumably cis white guy with a net worth large enough to ensure he could never work another day in his life if he didn't want to.
I am aware of what is and is not intended for commercial purposes here. This is a parody of slash fiction that happens to involve the likenesses of two relatively well known individuals. As a parody, their consent to the use of their names and appearances is not required.
Putting aside whether or not that was actually funny, it's not like anyone's ever really consented to creepy fan fiction being written about them in the first place. If you want to get into libel law, due to this being a creative work intending to make a profit in part due to inspiration from others and/or their work, this clearly falls under parody and is thus exempt from any kind of consent on the part of One Direction.
In other words, sit down, shut up, and take a fucking joke.
I've never been the biggest Sleater-Kinney fan. As someone who loves St. Vincent, I'm really looking forward to their upcoming album, but it's certainly not a record they needed to make. What I have learned from people more into Sleater-Kinney is that they really like Sleater-Kinney, and it feels like a great shame that those people, who have seen this lineup release a good handful of classic albums they hold dear to their hearts, are now seeing that lineup split up over a record that, let's be honest, is probably something only Carrie is really invested in. Bands are obviously allowed to evolve and change their sound, but that is 100% a group decision. People are attached to this band for a very distinct style and sound, and it seems wasteful to disregard at least a third of your band to chase something that'd be better suited away from its name and legacy for that reason. I hope Weiss continues to make music that resonates with what Sleater-Kinney's core audience really wants, because it's clear that they're not looking to offer that right now. Again, they have every right to change direction, but to do so without the full support of the group and costing them a legendary drummer seems more than a little wasteful.
Genuine question, no snark involved whatsoever, why can't musicians with more money than god simply buy back their masters?
Also, I'd kind of blanked the "Famous" music video from my memory and holy shit it's somehow even more creepy and disgusting than I remember.
Hearing Acid Rap for the first time in 2019, I'm left wondering why anyone ever gave so much or a shit about it. Honestly not sure if it's because it just isn't for me or if there's a nostalgia factor at work. It sounds dated as hell, but I can see why people would think this was cool six years ago.
Comments